|
|
WHAT
IS ACCELERATED TEAM FORMATION? |
|
|
|
Rationale
 |
Teams
go through predictable stages of development:
 |
Forming
(characterized by): orientation, testing dependency
|
 |
Storming:
organizing to get work done, intra-group conflict
|
 |
Norming:
information flow, group cohesion
|
 |
Performing:
problem solving, interdependence
|
|
 |
Accelerating
the team formation process enables the team to achieve better results
(by getting to “performing”) faster.
|
Potential
Applications
 |
Forming
a merger-integration
team |
 |
Multi-site
development projects |
 |
Virtual
teams |
 |
Action-learning
teams formed to accomplish a specific task quickly (e.g., assess the
feasibility of building a plant in China, salvage a damaged but key
customer relationship and prevent it from ever happening again)
|
Residual
Benefits
 |
Develop
tools / processes for facilitating team formation that are
customizable and replicable
|
|
|
|
|
GOALS
OF TEAM FORMATION |
|
|
|
 |
Build
trust
|
 |
Establish
a sense of identity / group cohesion
|
 |
Establish
shared norms for how the team will function
|
 |
Clarify
roles and responsibilities
|
 |
Enhance
“team literacy” skills for:
 |
communicating
(mental models)
|
 |
problem
solving (systems thinking)
|
 |
organizing
(team maintenance roles)
|
 |
learning
(improving their own effectiveness)
|
|
 |
Make
team dynamics explicit so team members can manage them themselves
|
 | Create a shared vision |
|
|
|
|
SUCCESS
FACTORS FOR ACCELERATING TEAM FORMATION |
|
|
|
 |
Front-end
analysis (to customize the process), determining
 |
Team
purpose (product development, marketing, etc.)
|
 |
Team
type (work group, project team, etc.)
|
 |
Team
duration (permanent or ad hoc)
|
 |
Team
membership
 |
Relative
newness of members to each other
|
 |
Homogeneity/heterogeneity
(of ethnicity, function, level)
|
 |
Status
differentials (‘second class’ perception, in-group / out-
group; ‘us’ vs. ‘them’; “we acquired them”; etc.)
|
|
|
 |
Other
success factors
 |
Buy-in
to the process by both team leader and members
|
 |
Integrated
with real work; perceived as relevant
 |
Topics
discussed are selected by and important to the team
|
|
 | Accountability for learning over an extended time |
|
|
|
|
|
THE
TEAM FORMATION PROCESS |
|
|
|
 |
Intensive
team building (3-5 days) focused on:
 |
encouraging
participation & high energy / enthusiasm
|
 |
acquiring
team learning skills (mental models, communication / dialogue,
systems thinking)
|
 |
inspiring
personal mastery (courage, honesty, etc.)
|
 |
building
shared vision
|
|
 |
Heavy
initial facilitation, but …
 |
ever-increasing
the team members’ responsibility for their own learning and
leadership
|
|
 |
Periodic
follow-up sessions
 |
E.g.,
4 to 6 half day sessions, spaced over 2 months
|
 |
To
reinforce team learnings, build new skills
|
 |
Initial commitment is to the entire process |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS |
|
|
|
Each design
is customized to needs of each particular team. and may include:
 | Use
of simulations |
 |
Use
of self-score instruments, followed by discussion
|
 | Low-rope
team-building elements |
|
|
| top |
|